Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
162-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

162-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.004575 50.853628)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.004489 50.853619,-1.004493 50.853635,-1.004505 50.853651,-1.004524 50.853663,-1.004547 50.853670,-1.004574 50.853673,-1.004600 50.853671,-1.004624 50.853663,-1.004643 50.853652,-1.004655 50.853637,-1.004660 50.853620,-1.004656 50.853603,-1.004644 50.853588,-1.004626 50.853576,-1.004602 50.853568,-1.004576 50.853565,-1.004549 50.853568,-1.004526 50.853575,-1.004506 50.853587,-1.004494 50.853602,-1.004489 50.853619)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL